August 6, 2012
Apple’s Next Ad

In light of the sense of triumph and excitement over the Mars Curiosity Rover, doesn’t the photo above seem like the perfect ad for Apple?

Nothing says “get shit done with our computers” like a group of human beings using Macbooks to land a nuclear powered truck onto a planet 155 million miles away by lowering it to the surface of said planet with a rocket-powered sky-crane on a 14 minute delay from inside a control room. [via theloop]

July 31, 2012
Amazon Cloud Player Gets iTunes-Like Scan and Match

Amazon just updated its Cloud Player music storage service with an iTunes Match-like feature that allows Amazon to just scan a user’s music library and add matching songs to that user’s library without having to upload those songs one by one.

Like Apple’s service, it costs $25 per year. Apple’s service only makes sense if you have an iPhone and iPad, whereas Amazon’s service makes sense for everyone else with large music libraries that want access from any device and any location.

I really like Amazon’s Cloud Player, but stopped using it because of storage limitations. As someone with a huge music library, it just didn’t make sense to continue using it. Google’s music locker let me store practically all my music and Spotify is great when I’m at work. I’m tempted to give it another shot with this update.

July 27, 2012
Innovation is Hard

Perhaps Apple’s greatest magic trick, if you will, is that for the past decade they’ve made culture-altering innovation seems positively easy. That innovation is actually really difficult by large companies should be the main takeaway from Kurt Eichenwald’s deep-dive into the Steve Ballmer-era at Microsoft, writes Matt Yglesias at Slate.

For example, Eichenwald notes:

Years passed. Finally, on November 14, 2006, Microsoft introduced its own music player, called Zune. Fifty-four days later, Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone, which combined a mobile phone, a music player, Internet capability, a camera, and other features not available on Zune. But the iPod was still around for customers who didn’t want a phone. In fact, Apple had already introduced its fifth-generation iPod, its less expensive iPod Mini, and was about a year away from marketing the least costly of its music players, the iPod Nano.

Zune was blown away. By 2009, iPod maintained an astonishing 71 percent of the market, the kind of numbers rarely seen anywhere outside of a North Korean election. Meanwhile, Zune limped along with less than 4 percent. Last October, Microsoft discontinued it, in hopes that customers would instead purchase a Windows Phone that, like the iPhone, has a music player.

By the time Microsoft was introducing its iPod competitor to the world, Apple had moved on to the iPhone. That seems insane. “It’s at least possible that Windows 8 will be a huge hit and people will turn in drove to buy smartphones and tablets that seemlessly integrate with the still-dominant desktop PC platform and we’ll all look back on the ten-year Apple Bubble and laugh. Financial markets are betting against that, but it’s not a crazy story,” Yglesias notes.

Here’s the thing, while Microsoft is skating to where Apple is currently playing with the puck, Apple is skating to where they want the puck to be. A perfect example of that is with the new “Mountain Lion” OS X release. Most reviews have said it is merely incrementally better than the previous version, however, Wired’s Roberto Baldwin insists the OS is the perfect cord-cutting operating system.

As someone that is a “cord-cutter” and follows that technology trend with a passion, this fascinates me to no end. The AirPlay integration is a minor feature, but its potential is devastating.

Once your mirroring set-up is complete, anything you might play on your desktop can be displayed on your big-screen TV — and this is where all that unique, cord-cutting potential comes into play. Sure, you can start playing computer games on the big-screen. And you can also pipe Rdio tunes, or any other music, directly to your TV speakers. But most importantly, you can mirror all those free, streaming desktop services that would otherwise cost money (or not work at all) if streamed directly to a TV.

For example: Hulu’s free, PC-only streaming library is suddenly available on your TV without Hulu’s $8 monthly tax in the form of a Hulu Plus subscription (this tax is imposed on set-top devices like the Xbox 360 and Sony Playstation). And then there’s CBS.com. On the network’s website, you can watch (and now AirPlay mirror) tons of network TV shows. Yes, these shows also appear in the CBS iOS app, but the app doesn’t support AirPlay mirroring. The same holds true for ABC content: It can be mirrored via ABC.com, but not via ABC’s iOS app.

How long will all this streaming desktop content remain free and unfettered? Only time will tell, but the latest evolutions in desktop mirroring could have long-term effects on the delicate relationships between Hollywood content producers, cable and satellite companies, and technology companies like Apple. Currently, desktop computers are somewhat of a bastion for free, streaming content, as evidenced by the Hulu, CBS and ABC policies above. Restrictions are tighter on mobile devices, and this even extends to YouTube, which disables mobile viewing — but not desktop viewing — for user videos that contain copyrighted music content.

Innovation is hard. Yet, Apple continues to make it look easy. [via @swartsr]

July 25, 2012
Apple Releases OS X Mountain Lion

The difference between Apple and Microsoft? Apple announced OS X Mountain Lion in February and today you can buy the update for $20.

I feel like we’ve been waiting for Windows 8 to release for at least a year. It strikes me that Microsoft’s biggest problem is they aren’t nimble enough to compete in the current consumer tech landscape. It’s not that they don’t have a vision — they do — it’s just the game is moving faster than they are currently playing. They have the enterprise tech and money to sustain themselves, but what if their bet on Windows 8 fails?

That’s probably another story for another day. As for today, the two reviews you need to read regarding Apple’s new OS are from John Gruber and John Siracusa.

July 23, 2012
The Main Reason for the iPad Mini Rumors

Apple is great at covering the entire umbrella for any market it enters. What that means is for the iPhone and iPod the company offers a range of products across a range of prices (inexpensive to costly) to appeal to everyone. With the iPod, Apple created new products in the iPod Shuffle and Nano. With the iPhone, they used older phone models (specifically the 3GS) to offer a free product.

It remains to be seen strategically what they will do with the iPad to cover the umbrella, but the sure bet is Apple will. The reason for the iPad mini rumors is that Apple can’t really get anyone to subsidize older iPad models like they can with the iPhone, so that leaves making and selling older hardware at a loss or developing a new product, according to Ryan Jones at I Am Concise.

This becomes especially important for Apple as Amazon gets ready to announce a new lineup of Kindle Fires and Google has found success with the Nexus 7.

June 23, 2012
Three Screens and a Cloud

Microsoft is finally putting the pieces in place for its “three screens and a cloud” approach to computing. It’s the same one Apple is successfully taking, obviously, and one that Google is currently struggling how to crack. We won’t know how Microsoft fairs until all of its Windows 8 products are released, as well as the next-generation Xbox.

June 12, 2012
The New iPad Case

Much will be made about all the new computers, improvements to iOS and OSX, and the slight middle finger to Google from Apple yesterday. However, the also announced Smart Case, is a $50 polyurethane back cover integrated with the smart case, comes in six colors, and looks like it’ll better protect your iPad.

I personally love the arctic blue color. It’s quite soothing.

June 4, 2012
Four Things on the Future of Television

These all seem somewhat related.

1. DirecTV chairman Michael White said “it’s hard to see [AppleTV] obsoleting our technology.” The problem with this belief, is Apple basically obsoleted the last three markets they entered: Mp3 player, mobile phone, and tablet computers. Why should anyone think TV would be different?

2. Alex Micek offers five thoughts on television, all of which is quite illuminating.

3. You should be worried about this exchange by The Verge’s Joshua Topolsky and Hollywood agent Ari Emanuel.

What Ari seems to forget, and what maybe politicians and the film and TV industry seem to forget is the last time piracy was a flashpoint between the entertainment and tech industries, the problem was not solved by sledgehammer legislation. Or takedowns. Or yelling. It was solved by the music industry accepting that their old model was broken, and technologists figuring out a new way to do business. And that gets to the core of this problem for Ari. We didn’t go back to the way things were after the RIAA sued college students — the industry changed.

He doesn’t want to change his business model, and he will do anything he can to protect it — including altering the basic functionality of the internet.

4. Henry Blodget examines the recent television trends and concludes: “Remember what happened in the newspaper business. When the Internet arrived, user behavior started to change. It took a decade for this change in behavior to hit the business. But when it hit the business, it hit it hard—and it destroyed it shockingly quickly. And the same thing seems likely to happen to the TV business.”

Blodget’s summation of the business trends is worth reading for those that don’t obsessively follow television futurism and it’s also worth reading the counter-point by Dan Frommer that it won’t collapse anytime soon because companies have too much invested in the current model.

(Bonus: Now that Game of Thrones has ended and Mad Men is about to conclude, the summer tv season is mostly reality shit. But, fear not! The Atlantic has a quick preview of summer shows worth watching.)

May 7, 2012
Steve Jobs Plays FDR in an Internal Apple Spot From 1984

Network World got the scoop and writes: “Entitled “1944,” the almost 9-minute full version was Apple’s in-house takeoff on “1984,” the iconic first Macintosh TV ad that caused a sensation during that year’s Super Bowl. Set as a World War II tale of good vs. IBM, it is a broadcast-quality production (said to have cost $50,000) that was designed to fire up Apple’s international sales force at a 1984 meeting in Hawaii. A copy of “1944” was provided to me by one-time Apple employee Craig Elliott, now CEO of Pertino Networks, a cloud-computing startup located two blocks from Apple in Cupertino.”

Your guess is as good as mine? The full version of the spot runs nearly nine minutes long and features the hammer throwing girl from the 1984 spot.

April 24, 2012
Four Semi-Related Mobile Phone Stories of Doom

Amazingly, these stories are also for four different mobile phone companies.

1. RIM, beleaguered makers of the BlackBerry, has hired a law firm for restructuring purposes.

2. In the last quarter, the iPhone accounted for 78% of all smartphone sales at AT&T and at Verizon, the iPhone accounted for slightly more than half of all sales. Still, somehow Business Insider paints this as a negative for Apple.

3. Jay Yarow lays out the case that Google’s Android mobile OS will be in trouble come 2012 for all the reasons tech people are already aware of: fragmentation, lack of developer interest, poor tablet sales, and potential for Android forking — like what happened with the Kindle Fire.

4. Finally, there’s Microsoft’s Windows Phone, which according to Dan Frommer, is also in trouble. He does reason that Microsoft could use Windows 8 and the Xbox as beachheads into a better share of the mobile OS market.

TL;DR: every mobile OS is doomed to fail in 2012. Or something like that.

April 12, 2012
Watch an iPad Get Made

Rob Schmitz, who exposed Mike Daisey’s lies, reports for Marketplace with a behind-the-scenes look at the now-infamous Foxconn iPad assembly line in China. [via daringfireball]

April 10, 2012
A Month Without Apple or Google

Dan Lyons attempts to live life in the absence of any Apple or Google products for a month. Lyons called his experiment “the month with Microsoft” to determine if the once-dominant tech company could become great again.

I’ve spent the past four weeks using nothing but Microsoft products—Windows computers, Windows phones, Xbox, Bing, Internet Explorer—instead of my usual lineup of Apple and Google products. It’s been six years since I used any Microsoft products on a regular basis. I wasn’t sure what to expect.

The verdict? Microsoft is making some really nice products these days. What it still can’t do is tie all these products into a single, well-integrated ecosystem. Don’t worry; nobody else can either. But that’s where everyone is headed. If Microsoft can pull off this integration, it could very well give Apple a run for its money.

What everyone is after these days is a kind of single, unified experience where all content (music collection, movies owned or rented, plus home movies, photos, documents) is kept up on the Internet cloud, in a single place.

A series of devices—phone, tablet, laptop computer, desktop computer, TV—can fetch any of that content from the cloud. Watch a movie on the phone, then pause it and watch the rest of it on the TV. Edit a document on a work computer, store it to the cloud, work on it on a tablet during the train ride home, then work on it again with a laptop on the couch at night.

All this has to happen seamlessly. And it must be incredibly simple and easy to use.

So far, no tech company can deliver this. But Microsoft has all the pieces. It just needs to bring them together.

I would agree that Microsoft has all the pieces to do what Lyons describes. I would also agree that his assessment of what people want from their technology is heading in that very direction. But I would whole-heartedly disagree with his assessment that no tech company is doing this.

Apple is already there. They might need to do a few things here or there to improve the foundation it’s already laid, but Apple does all of what Lyons describes and does it very, very well. Google recognizes this is the future and is trying to get the puzzle pieces to put them together. Microsoft has all the puzzle pieces ready to assemble but is starring at them with no concept of how to put the puzzle together.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »